common.j/ForGroup

From WarCraft3

I think that, as soon as things starting to shape up, we should refactor these "longer descriptions" to seperate pages. Eg, one page for unit group function, one page for sound ect. common.j have some logical groping between the natives and this would probably be a good structure. Comments? --Phyrex1an 16:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

That could be pretty good, yes. Though I think we'll need to use a grouping that differs a bit from common.j's one, as it has eg. rects and locations in one group (IMO locations should have one of their own).

Should they be named like Group API? Would fit the common.j comments. ^_^

--Artificial (Without Intelligence) 17:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

I created the Group API page but I didn't move the detailed example, yet. I'm still thinking about what kind of info should be on the API page and what info should be on the native page. I think we should make the Group API as good as possible before starting (to much) on the other API pages. --Phyrex1an 17:23, 3 March 2009 (UTC)